![]() 08/22/2017 at 13:07 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
95k miles, auto, but t-tops and so clean you could eat off it....$19k ouch
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
But this is a much more tempting alternative, looks beautifully clean, manual and well taken care of. 200k+ miles, but it’s a Toyota? -
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 08/22/2017 at 13:12 |
|
Wouldn’t that transmission destroy half the value?
![]() 08/22/2017 at 13:32 |
|
I would think so too. To me the $5k manual with 219k miles seems like a better buy, one that I wouldn’t feel too bad about driving to my heart’s content.
![]() 08/22/2017 at 13:45 |
|
cuckoo pricing. No way these have gone up from like $4000 in the past couple of years to this.
![]() 08/22/2017 at 13:50 |
|
I wouldn’t spend 20k on a turbo SW20, no way an NA, automatic AW11 is worth that.
![]() 08/22/2017 at 13:54 |
|
Extraordinarily clean, but still way too much, I agree…especially for an auto non-supercharged version.
The manual alternative for $5k with 200k miles is way more
up my alley and much better value for money I’d say. I have no interest in
collecting museum pieces…I just want clean, well-cared-for cars that I can
drive as much as I want to.
![]() 08/22/2017 at 13:56 |
|
Agreed…it’s a treat to see a car this clean, but no way in hell I’m buying one for that kind of money. Especially an auto NA.
The $5k one is a good deal I’d say – cars that clean are pretty hard to come by these days and from what I’ve seen asking prices are closer to $8-10k typically. $5k for a car with some minor repairs needed (AC recharge, window regulator) seems fair to me. Especially compared to the options out there around $3-4k being in such poor shape.